Virtual Screening and Comparison of the Binding Effectiveness of Doxorubicin, Paclitaxel, and Ergoloid to ERβ-MDM2 Complex Protein as New Breast Cancer Drug Candidates

Novyananda Salmasfattah, Binar Asrining Dhiani, Faisal Akhmal Muslikh, Galih Satrio Putra

Abstract


Background: The prevalence of breast cancer continues to increase, it is the second leading cause of death after lung cancer. Estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) has an important role in breast cancer pathology, activation of Akt pathway will trigger E3 ubiquitin ligase murine double minute 2 (MDM2) to ERβ, which will increase the risk of breast cancer. Thus, both proteins have potential as therapeutic agents in breast cancer drug development. This study aims to find breast cancer drug candidates from natural products and compare the effectiveness of these compounds with Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel.

Method: ERβ (PDB ID: 3OLS) and MDM2 (PDB ID: 1T4E) proteins were combined using ClusPro 2.0. Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel ligands were obtained from PubChem, there are 842 natural products obtained from the ZINC database, when the energy minimization is reduced to 839 natural products. Virtual screening between proteins and ligands was performed using PyRx 8.0, followed by analysis of amino acid residues resulting from interactions between proteins and ligands using protein interaction calculator (PIC) and protein ligand interaction profiler (PLIP).

Results: Ergoloid compounds have the lowest binding affinity compared to doxorubicin and paclitaxel compounds, and are able to interact strongly with the ERβ-MDM2 Protein as determined from the results of interactions between proteins and ligands using PIC and PLIP.

Conclusion: Ergoloid compounds can interact well with ERβ-MDM2 Protein. Thus, it can be used as a breast cancer drug candidate in the future. In vitro, in vivo, and biochemical testing needs to be done to confirm this discovery


Keywords


virtual screening, breast cancer, doxorubicin, paclitaxel, ergoloid

Full Text: View | Download

DOI: 10.33371/ijoc.v19i2.1325

Article Metrics

Abstract View: 451,
PDF Download: 142
             

References


Pangestu L, Oktavelia W, Ardiansyah F, et al. In Silico Study of Phenolic Derivatives Compounds from Olive Plants (Olea europaea L.) as HER2 Inhibitors in Breast Cancer. JCHEM. 2023 Jan 31;57.

WHO. Cancer [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 15]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news - room/fact - sheets/detail/cancer.

UICC. GLOBOCAN 2020: New Global Cancer Data [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2020 Jan 5]. Available from: https://www.uicc.org/news/globocan-2020-new-global-cancer-data

Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 2018 Nov;68(6):394–424.

Clusan L, Ferrière F, Flouriot G, Pakdel F. A Basic Review on Estrogen Receptor Signaling Pathways in Breast Cancer. IJMS. 2023 Apr 6;24(7):6834.

Nurlelasari N, Widyana A, Julaeha E, et al. Studi In Silico Aktivitas Senyawa Steroid Terhadap Antikanker Payudara Menggunakan Estrogen Alfa (ER-α). ALCHEMY JPenKim. 2023 Mar 23;19(1):44.

Sari SE, Harahap WA, Saputra D. Pengaruh Faktor Risiko Terhadap Ekspresi Reseptor Estrogen Pada Penderita Kanker Payudara Di Kota Padang. 2018;

Hakim A. Relationship of Obesity With Hormonal Receptor (Estrogen and Progesteron Receptor) And Her-2/Neu Expression on Breast Cancer. 2018;10.

Elebro K, Borgquist S, Rosendahl AH, et al. High Estrogen Receptor β Expression Is Prognostic among Adjuvant Chemotherapy-Treated Patients-Results from a Population-Based Breast Cancer Cohort. Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Feb 1;23(3):766–77.

Salmasfattah N, Nurulita NA, Dhiani BA. Virtual Screening on Molecules Targeting the Interaction Between Estrogen Receptor Beta and Murine Double Minute 2. Indones J Cancer Chemoprevent. 2023 Feb 14;13(3):184.

Treeck O, Schuler-Toprak S, Skrzypczak M, Weber F. Knockdown of PTEN decreases expression of estrogen receptor β and tamoxifen sensitivity of human breast cancer cells. National Library of Medicine. 2020;153.

Wang J, Zhang C, Chen K, et al. ERβ1 inversely correlates with PTEN/PI3K/AKT pathway and predicts a favorable prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2015 Jul;152(2):255–69.

Sanchez M, Picard N, Sauvé K, Tremblay A. Coordinate regulation of estrogen receptor β degradation by Mdm2 and CREB-binding protein in response to growth signals. Oncogene. 2013 Jan 3;32(1):117–26.

Zhou Y, Liu X. The role of estrogen receptor beta in breast cancer. Biomark Res. 2020 Dec;8(1):39.

Islam S, Islam N, Kermode T, et al. Involvement of Caspase-3 in Epigallocatechin-3-gallate-Mediated Apoptosis of Human Chondrosarcoma Cells. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications. 2000 Apr;270(3):793–7.

García-Quiroz J, García-Becerra R, Santos-Cuevas C, et al. Synergistic Antitumorigenic Activity of Calcitriol with Curcumin or Resveratrol is Mediated by Angiogenesis Inhibition in Triple Negative Breast Cancer Xenografts. Cancers. 2019 Nov;11(11):1739.

Kozakov D, Hall DR, Xia B, et al. The ClusPro web server for protein–protein docking. Nat Protoc. 2017 Feb;12(2):255–78.

Comeau SR, Gatchell DW, Vajda S, Camacho CJ. ClusPro: a fully automated algorithm for protein– protein docking. 2004;

Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins. 2002 Jun;47(4):409–43.

Magnez R, Bailly C, Thuru X. Microscale Thermophoresis as a Tool to Study Protein Interactions and Their Implication in Human Diseases. IJMS. 2022 Jul 12;23(14):7672.

Hawse JR, Carter JM, Aspros KGM, et al. Optimized immunohistochemical detection of estrogen receptor beta using two validated monoclonal antibodies confirms its expression in normal and malignant breast tissues. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Jan;179(1):241–9.

Chang J, Liu J, Li H, et al. Expression of ERβ gene in breast carcinoma and the relevance in neoadjuvant therapy. Oncology Letters. 2017 Mar;13(3):1641–6.

Sun SY, Crago A. MDM2 Implications for Potential Molecular Pathogenic Therapies of Soft-Tissue Tumors. JCM. 2023 May 24;12(11):3638.

Zhu H, Gao H, Ji Y, et al. Targeting p53–MDM2 interaction by small-molecule inhibitors: learning from MDM2 inhibitors in clinical trials. J Hematol Oncol. 2022 Dec;15(1):91.

Klein AM, Biderman L, Tong D, et al. MDM2, MDMX, and p73 regulate cell-cycle progression in the absence of wild-type p53. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021 Nov 2;118(44):e2102420118.

Schneider L, Olin JT, Novit A, Luczak S. Hydergine for dementia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000 Jul 24;2000(3):CD000359.

Kapoor VK, Dureja J, Chadha R. Herbals in the control of ageing. Drug Discovery Today. 2009 Oct 1;14(19):992–8.

Schneider LS, Olin JT. Overview of Clinical Trials of Hydergine in Dementia. Archives of Neurology. 1994 Aug 1;51(8):787–98.

Flynn BL, Ranno AE. Pharmacologic management of Alzheimer disease, Part II: Antioxidants, antihypertensives, and ergoloid derivatives. Ann Pharmacother. 1999 Feb;33(2):188–97.

DailyMed - ERGOLOID MESYLATES- dihydroergocornine mesylate, dihydroergocristine mesylate, dihydro-.alpha.-ergocryptine mesylate, and dihydro-.beta.-ergocryptine mesylate tablet [Internet]. [cited 2024 Dec 20]. Available from: https://dailymed.nlm.nih.gov/dailymed/lookup.cfm?setid=cf973160-d467-4192-a432-04c8c2140369

Approved Drug Products With Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations [Internet]. 44th ed. U.S. Department of Health And Human Services; 2023. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/UCM071436.pdf

Thompson TL, Filley CM, Mitchell WD, et al. Lack of efficacy of hydergine in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. N Engl J Med. 1990 Aug 16;323(7):445–8.

Percheson PB, Carroll JJ. The Use of Hydergine in Obstetrics. Can Med Assoc J. 1954 Dec;71(6):588–94.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.